Envision New Outlooks


Thought leaders envision creative ideas on key topics across the breadth of computer graphics and interactive techniques. Redefine tomorrow with your insights and important contributions.

View Program Content

Talks Hero Image

Talks encompass a broad array of topics and viewpoints from the greater SIGGRAPH community and create an inspiring, informative, and compelling experience for all SIGGRAPH participants.

Advance the industry by presenting your work in the SIGGRAPH 2024 Talks. This is your opportunity to present new techniques, novel applications of existing techniques, and other developments with broad interest to practitioners of computer graphics and interactive techniques.

We encourage Talks that elaborate on a full range of topics relevant to computer graphics and interactive techniques: academic research, case studies, DEI, education and curriculum, games, pipeline tools, professional development, or technical developments.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
SIGGRAPH prioritizes conversations and industry contributions that spotlight how diversity, equity, and inclusion makes our communities, industries, and teams stronger. Conference programs provide a safe place to grow, discuss, learn from one another, and to bridge boundaries with the goal of making our community more inclusive and accessible to all. SIGGRAPH encourages submissions that spotlight DEI content across every SIGGRAPH program.

Susan Reiser
SIGGRAPH 2024 General Submissions Chair

How to Submit

Building a desirable future through computer graphics and interactive techniques starts with you and your contributions to and participation in SIGGRAPH 2024. We are excited that you are submitting your work for consideration.

Log into the submission portal, select the “Make a New Submission” tab, select “General Submissions,” and select “Talks” under “Presentation Formats.” To see the information you need to submit, view the sample submission form.

In particular, please be aware of these fields:

  • A presentation format. To propose a Talk, please select Talks as your presentation format. You will then be taken to the forms specific to this presentation format. Please see below for more details about required information and materials for this presentation format.
  • Unique emails per contributor are required.
  • One representative image suitable for use on the conference website and in promotional materials. See the Representative Image Guidelines tab located on the Submission FAQ page.
  • Abstract. The abstract should include what area you work in, what is novel about your work, and how this work fits into existing work.The document you submit for review should be a single column PDF, which can be prepared in Microsoft Word or LaTeX – we recommend the use of LaTeX, and the “manuscript” parameter to the \documentclass will prepare the PDF as a one-column document:  \documentclass[manuscript]{acmart} If you are using Microsoft Word to prepare your submission, print the document to a PDF fileThis “submitted for review” PDF may be more than two pages in length.If accepted for presentation, the final PDF version of your documentation must be no more than two pages in length, including references, and will be generated in TAPS from your Microsoft Word or LaTeX source material.

    Abstracts should include authors’ names and affiliations, as the review process is “single blind.”

  • Length and Format: There are two Talks formats: 20- or 40-minute presentations. Due to scheduling constraints, the jury will be significantly more demanding of submissions that request the longer length, so please be sure to justify why you need the extra time. If your Talk can be adapted to either the short or longer length, we encourage you to request either length and let the jury decide which is more appropriate. Unfortunately, based on scheduling and venue constraints, your preference is not guaranteed. All Talks must include time for Q&A.
    • Talks are 20 or 40 minutes in length and based on your accepted Talk length. Plan 2-3 minutes for Q&A in a 20-minute Talk, and 5 minutes for Q&A in a 40-minute Talk.
  • A list of potential submission categories and keywords is provided to help ensure your submission is reviewed and juried appropriately. Please select the categories and keywords carefully.


  • Up to six supplementary images and/or a maximum three-minute supplementary video. We strongly encourage wide format images and MP4 video files. File size should not exceed 200 MB. The files must be uploaded using the online submission system.
  • Supplementary text document (PDF). This material can include text and images to help the jury further understand any unique results of your submission beyond the merits of your required abstract. This material is only for optional jury use and might not be reviewed. Critical information for your submission should be noted in your abstract. There are no limits to the length of supplementary text, but please remember that this material is for optional jury use, and reviewers may be overwhelmed by large volumes of supplementary information. Please try to limit the supplementary material to four pages if possible.
  • Non-native English speakers are highly encouraged to use the English Review Services to help improve the text of submissions. Please note that this process takes time, so plan far ahead in order to meet the submission deadline.
  • Educator’s Resources Submission. Those submitting content to a SIGGRAPH conference can indicate interest in donating materials of value to the education community on the ACM SIGGRAPH Education Committee website. Learn more.
  • For additional submission information, please see the Submissions FAQ.
Back to Top


Common Evaluation Criteria
Jurors are asked to evaluate your submission using four criteria: concept, novelty, interest, and quality. The final submission score is based on a combination of these factors. For example, a high-quality talk that has broad appeal and is unlike other recent SIGGRAPH Talks has a good chance of acceptance, while a poorly motivated submission of interest to few participants (or that duplicates recent talks) probably will be rejected. Work is evaluated on the quality and completeness of the materials submitted.

Examples of accepted content from past conferences, including Talks, have been made freely available by the ACM SIGGRAPH organization and can be accessed here.

How exceptional are the ideas, problems, solutions, aesthetics, etc., presented in this submission? How coherently does the submission convey its overall concept? Is the concept similar to existing ones, or does it stand out? This criterion is particularly applicable to submissions that pull together existing technologies into a single product (for example: demos, animations, art pieces). Submissions of this type, where the individual technologies are not necessarily new but their combination is, are evaluated on both the final product and how well proposed technologies integrate to meet the desired goals. Many submissions in this area are rejected because they do what existing systems do, and they do not demonstrate that the proposed approach leads to better results.

How new and fresh is this work? Is it a new, groundbreaking approach to an old problem, or is it an existing approach with a slightly new twist? You must first demonstrate to the jury that your work is sufficiently different from existing approaches. Second, you should evaluate your work in the context of other approaches where appropriate. Is it faster? Easier to use? Does it give better results? Is it more accurate? Many submissions are rejected either because the work is too similar to existing work or because the submission materials did not convince the jury that the improvements were substantial enough.

Will conference participants want to see this? Will it inspire them? Are the results or approach appealing to a broad audience? This is partly a measure of how broad the potential audience is and partly a measure of the overall clarity and novelty of the submission. A submission in a very niche area is more likely to be accepted if the results are exceptionally better than what exists already or if the proposed solution might be applicable to other areas.

Quality, Craft, and Completeness
This is a measure of how well written the abstract is and the quality of the supporting materials. The abstract must effectively communicate both the problem and the solution in enough detail and clarity that the jury can evaluate it. You also must convince the jury that your solution works. Many submissions are rejected because, although the problem and solution seemed interesting, the materials did not convince the jury that the solution had actually been implemented and evaluated. If your submission has an animation, simulation, or interactive component, then including a video is essential.

The jury will sort Talks submissions into focus categories for some long-established communities within SIGGRAPH: research, production, and education. This sorting is used in scheduling accepted talks into meaningful sessions and to provide “at-a-glance” information to participants. The primary reason for rejection of each type of talk is given below to help submitters understand what the jury will be looking for in typical Talks submissions.

Research Talks
Accepted Research Talks typically fall into one of two categories: an exploration of a new problem or a novel approach to an existing problem. For talks on new problems, the jury accepts those they believe will interest attendees and inspire subsequent discussions or research. For talks about solving existing problems, the jury accepts those that clearly solve a problem of interest to many participants. Primary reasons a talk is rejected include:

  • The jury was unconvinced the work solves a new or existing problem. This can happen either because the abstract did not clearly differentiate the work from existing work, or the proposed solution was too incremental.
  • The jury was unconvinced that there was sufficient improvement over existing work. It is not sufficient for the approach to simply be new; the submission materials also must demonstrate that the proposed approach works better (it is faster, more accurate, uses less memory, easier to use, etc.) than existing work.
  • The submission materials did not clearly convey both the problem and the proposed solution. If the jury has to struggle to understand the submission, they are unlikely to accept it. Good abstracts first provide a concise statement of the problem and solution, and then provide sufficient detail to convince the jury the submitter would present a compelling talk.
  • The area is off topic and unlikely to be of interest to SIGGRAPH participants.
  • The jury believes the talk will be an extended advertisement for a product.

Production Talks
Accepted Production Talks typically explore solutions to problems frequently encountered in production environments. They should be motivated by unique visual results or the production pipeline rather than production scope, size, or budget. Examples include new applications of research ideas in a production setting, combining existing techniques in new and unique ways, or improvements to pipeline tools or workflow for improved efficiency. The jury accepts Production Talks that will interest participants seeking details on production difficulties and their solutions, or because the technical details may interest the broader SIGGRAPH community. Production Talks are not limited to film and visual effects but could cover other application and production environments such as game development, mobile graphics, applications of interactive techniques, immersive environments, and art and design installations.

The abstract needs to provide context for the work and aesthetic goals, underlying technical solution, and some kind of evaluation metrics. To support the submission’s claims, we strongly encourage the inclusion of some kind of visual or video material, either work in progress or the finished result. The jury frequently rejects unsubstantiated submissions. It is possible to submit material for viewing only at the jury meeting (when it has not been approved for public display or release). Please contact the Talks Chair to make arrangements.

Primary reasons that a Production Talk is rejected:

  • The jury was unconvinced the submission provides a substantially new solution to a production problem. Exceptions may be made when the solution is only known to a small community; in this case, clearly acknowledge previous work and explain how this talk reaches a broader audience.
  • Workflow improvements are not supported by an objective measure (for example, a reduction in render time or short turnaround).
  • Critical visual media are missing, making it difficult for the jury to judge the approach in practice. If the media will be viewable only at the jury meeting, make that clear in the submission so jurors understand the images are only stand-ins.
  • The talk fails to cite existing work or explain differences from existing approaches. Although Talks need not be as rigorous as research papers, a clear discussion of the historical context is important.
  • For large productions with multiple Talks submissions, the jury may feel that there is some overlap, and some or all of the submitted talks could be merged into a single, stronger talk. In this case, they will reject one and accept the other, suggesting such a merger. If this is not acceptable, please contact the Talks Chair to discuss the situation.
  • The jury is unclear what they would learn by attending the talk. Vague talks are a waste of attendee time. Your submission should provide insight on the talk content.

Education Talks
Accepted Education Talks can include case studies of exemplary interdisciplinary courses and projects, curricula, tools, and new courses at the leading edge of graphics and interactive techniques content. Most educators attending the conference focus on undergraduate education, but there also is interest in informal education, K-12 education, and graduate education. Education Talks are often scheduled as part of the Educator’s Forum at the conference. Submitters are asked to select education as a category when submitting to help identify works appropriate for this focus area.

Non-Disclosure Agreements
SIGGRAPH reviewers cannot sign non-disclosure agreements for submissions. For information on patents and confidentiality, see the Submissions FAQ.

Back to Top

Upon Acceptance

  1. You will be notified of acceptance or rejection of your presentation in early May 2024. If your Talk is accepted you will receive an email from “rightsreview@acm.org” with a link to your ACM Rights Management form within 72 hours of notification of acceptance of your work to the conference.Your representative image and text may be used for promotional purposes. Several SIGGRAPH 2024 programs will prepare preview videos of accepted content for pre-conference promotion, which may include a portion of the video you submitted for review. You may grant or deny us the ability to use the representative image and submitted video for these purposes on the ACM Rights Management form.
  2. Complete Stage 2: Program Materials by Friday, 10 May 2024, which includes:
    1. Review your submission through the submission portal to confirm or update the list of contributors(s), affiliation(s), and 50-word summary statement suitable for conference publicity.
    2. Provide a valid ORCID identifier. (ACM requires that all accepted contributors register and provide ACM with valid ORCID identifiers prior to publication.) Corresponding contributors are responsible for collecting these ORCID identifiers from co-contributors and providing them to ACM as part of the ACM eRights selection process.
    3. You and your co-contributors can create and register your ORCID identifier at https://orcid.org/register. ACM only requires you to complete the initial ORCID registration process. However, ACM encourages you to take the additional step to claim ownership of all of your published works via the ORCID site.
  3. Publication

    When your ACM Rights Management Form has been delivered to ACM, you will then receive an email from “tapsadmin@aptaracorp.awsapps.com” with information about the preparation and delivery of your material to TAPS for publication. Please make sure that emails from “rightsreview@acm.org” and “tapsadmin@aptaracorp.awsapps.com” are part of the “allow list” in your email program, so that you do not miss these email messages.

    The source (Word or LaTeX) of your abstract, as well as any supplemental materials, must be delivered to TAPS, ACM’s article production system. TAPS will generate the PDF and HTML5 versions of your abstract for publication in the ACM Digital Library. The TAPS-generated PDF of your abstract must be no more than two pages in length, including references.

    You must deliver your material to TAPS, resolve any formatting issues identified by TAPS or by the proceedings production editor, and approve your material for publication by Friday, 17 May 2024. If you cannot meet that deadline, you will not be allowed to present your material at SIGGRAPH 2024.

    Information about the preparation and delivery of your final material to TAPS also can be found at https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~spencer/taps/taps.html.

  4. In-Person Presentations

    If your Talk is accepted, the Talks contributor must:

    • Only present accepted, jury-reviewed content. Presenting new content is not allowed.
    • Attend and present your Talk in-person at SIGGRAPH 2024 in Denver. All talks must include time for Q&A.
      • Talks that are 20 or 40 minutes in length, please allot 2-3 minutes for Q&A in a 20-minute Talk and 5 minutes for Q&A in a 40-minute Talk.
    • Contributors should plan to present from their own personal laptops. SIGGRAPH will provide the adapters needed to connect personal computers to the session projector.
  5. Presenter Recognition

    Short Talks (20 minutes)

    Contributor Registration Benefit: One contributor per accepted Short Talk receives a 25% discount on Full Conference registration.

    Long Talks (40 minutes)

    Contributor Registration Benefit: Up to two contributors per accepted Long Talk receives a 25% discount on Full Conference registration.

    To present your Talk at SIGGRAPH 2024, contributors must be registered at the Full Conference registration level.

    You will receive an email by early June explaining how to access the registration discount code as well as instructions for registering. The contributor using the discount code is eligible for the early-bird registration rate regardless of when registration is completed. Any additional contributor who will be presenting the Talk is required to register at the appropriate registration level for the program, and prevailing registration rates will apply.

Back to Top


21 February 2024, 22:00 UTC/GMT
Submission deadline.

Early May 2024
Acceptance or rejection notices are sent to all submitters.

10 May 2024
Deadline to make any changes to materials (i.e., approved title changes, contributors names, descriptions) for publication on the website.

17 May 2024
Two-page abstract deadline. If we do not receive your two-page abstract by 17 May, you will not be allowed to present at SIGGRAPH 2024.

26 July 2024
Official publication date for the ACM Digital Library.

Please Note: The official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of your conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work. (For those rare conferences whose proceedings are published in the ACM Digital Library after the conference is over, the official publication date remains the first day of the conference.)

28 July–1 August 2024
Colorado Convention Center
Denver, Colorado

Back to Top